ORDER
direction, review and publication of articles in the journal
"Financial and economic research"

1. Articles are accepted for consideration subject to strict compliance with the requirements for original authorship of articles and the availability of all accompanying documents. The executive secretary of the journal notifies the authors of the receipt of the article by e-mail, of receipt of the originals of all necessary documents and sends the articles for review.

2. Reviewing is a mandatory procedure for articles published in the journal. Received articles are initially checked for uniqueness and compliance with the requirements for article structure and formatting.

3. In the case of the original text of the article, prepared in compliance with all the requirements of the journal, the article is sent for internal review.

4. The review period in each individual case is determined taking into account the creation of conditions for the fastest possible publication of the article.

5. The editor-in-chief of the journal appoints reviewers. Reviewing is carried out by members of the editorial board in accordance with the scientific areas in which they specialize. All reviewers are recognized experts and have relevant publications on the subject of the scientific material being reviewed.

6. In the event of a temporary absence of members of the editorial board supervising the scientific direction on the subject of the submitted article, or the receipt of an article from a member of the editorial board, external reviewers may be involved in the review procedure. In this case, the external reviewer must be a recognized expert on the subject of the material being reviewed and have published within the last five years on the subject of the article under review.

7. Involving external reviewers is possible in the following cases: when there is no member of the editorial board in charge of a certain direction or scientific discipline; a member of the editorial board does not have the opportunity to prepare a review; the editorial board does not agree with the opinion expressed in the review by a member of the editorial board; An article is received from a member of the editorial board. At the next meeting of the editorial board, a decision is made to submit a request for review to a scientist who has scientific work on the issues stated in the article. On behalf of the editorial board, a letter is sent to such a scientist requesting a review. The article and the recommended review form are attached to the letter.

8. All reviews comply with generally accepted criteria in the scientific community and are prepared in the manner established by the editors.

9. The reviewer can recommend the article for publication; recommend for publication after revision taking into account comments; do not recommend the article for publication. If the reviewer recommends the article for publication after revision taking into account comments or does not recommend the article for publication, the review must indicate the reasons for this decision.

10. The presence of a significant proportion of the reviewer’s critical comments with a general positive recommendation allows us to classify the material as polemical and publish it as a scientific discussion.

11. The reviewer must review the submitted article within a month from the date of receipt and send to the editor the text of the review or a reasoned refusal to accept the article for publication in the journal.

12. The final decision on publication, publication after revision, or rejection of the article is made by the editorial board. Based on the decision made, a letter is sent to the authors. The letter gives a general assessment of the article; if the article can be published after revision (taking into account comments), recommendations for revision (elimination of comments) are given; if the article is not accepted for publication, the reasons for this decision are indicated.

13. If there are sufficient grounds, articles may be sent for additional review.

14. If the review is positive, but contains comments and suggestions, the editors send the articles to the authors for revision along with the reviewer’s comments. An article sent to the authors for revision must be returned in a corrected form as soon as possible. The revised manuscript must be accompanied by a letter from the authors containing responses to all comments and explaining all changes made in the article.

15. The editorial board sends copies of reviews or a reasoned refusal to the authors of the submitted materials. The editorial board does not enter into a discussion with the authors of rejected articles, except in cases determined to be an obvious misunderstanding.

16. The editors reserve the right to make minor technical corrections to the text of the article without violating its meaning and content.

17. Reviews are stored in the editorial office of the journal for five years. At the request of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, the editorial board of the journal sends copies of reviews of published articles to the Ministry.